optionly
HomeTradersCohortsSmart MoneyFlowArbOptionsMarkets
DeriveDeribit
Trade on Derive
optionly

Trader intelligence for Derive: who is trading, what they hold, who is good, and what the rules say is mispriced. Built from public fills and quotes, refreshed every few minutes.

HomeTradersCohortsSmart moneyFlowArbOptionsMarketsTrade spotlightHow smart money is scoredHow the homepage is built

Every number on the site is computed from public data by fixed rules; nothing is hand-picked except the wallets we say we follow. Nothing here is investment advice. Links to Derive may use Optionly's broker code, which pays Optionly a share of exchange fees at no cost to you. © 2026 Optionly.

0x1dfa…d6b4premium seller🐟 Fish

0x1dfa762116d96b53e057aef20e94576d4ca2d6b4owner 0x0cca…07a7on Derive since 9 Jun
90d PnL, marked
+$3.4K
+$3.2K realized · +$202.8 open
30d · 7d
+$1.5K
-$854.0 last 7 days
Return on gross
0.9%
$384.2K average book
Sortino · Sharpe
1.4 · 1.0
8 of 15 weeks positive
Max drawdown
-$3.6K
peak to trough, 90d
Account balances$146.8K
valued 31 Oct 10:59 UTC
1 account valued live by Derive: collateral plus open positions at mark, 4 positions on the exchange. This is balance, not trading PnL; deposits and withdrawals move it.
AccountValueCollateralPositionsMargin headroom
#61248 SM · 19 markets$146.8KWBTC 2.17 · USDC -3.9K4$76.8K · 52%
Trading PnL, 90 days
Cumulative trading PnL, including open positions at mark, net of fees. This is not account balance.
How they trade, 30 days
Fills
8 · 8 options, 0 perps
Notional
$271.6K · $271.6K options, $0.0 perps
Calls bought / sold
3 / 1
Puts bought / sold
0 / 4
Maker · RFQ
0% · 0 fills
Instruments · subaccounts
4 · 1
Far-OTM buys
0
Fees paid
$85.5
options 100% of notionalperps 0%

Two-sided maker ratio 0% · 67 winning and 53 losing closes.

Option closes
67 won / 53 lost · +$3.2K realized
Perp closes
none
Open positions
2 positions in 1 book, 2 with available marks (Derive first, Deribit fallback); unrealized +$225.4 against the average entry of the fills we have seen. Expired options excluded. Missing marks are excluded from the subtotal.
BookPositionsNotionalUnrealizedShapeNearest expiry
2$145K+$225short BTC 80k put, 25 Dec 26 ×0.95 · short BTC 75k put, 27 Nov 26 ×0.8527 Nov
Recent fills
RFQ legs grouped into one trade, runs of same-way fills into one sweep · times in UTC.
WhenWhatSizePriceNotionalExchange-reported realized
4 Oct 10:14Sold short BTC 80k put, 30 Oct 260.25$1,029.00$21.3K–
4 Oct 10:14Sold short BTC 92k call, 30 Oct 260.25$989.00$21.3K–
4 Oct 10:13Bought long BTC 86k call, 9 Oct 260.5$937.00$42.6K-$48.6
4 Oct 06:33Sold short BTC 80k put, 30 Oct 260.38$1,082.00$32.3K–
4 Oct 06:32Bought long BTC 86k call, 9 Oct 260.38$827.00$32.3K+$4.8
4 Oct 06:16Sold short BTC 80k put, 30 Oct 260.12$1,086.00$10.2K–
4 Oct 06:14Bought long BTC 86k call, 9 Oct 260.12$810.00$10.2K+$3.2
2 Oct 23:30Sold short BTC 80k put, 23 Oct 261.2$829.00$101.5K–
1 Oct 07:21Sold short BTC 85k call, 2 Oct 261$209.00$83.7K–
30 Sep 07:34Sold short BTC 85k call, 1 Oct 261$107.00$83.3K–
29 Sep 10:47Sold short BTC 86k call, 9 Oct 262 fills0.3$1,007.60$25.2K–
28 Sep 11:50Sold short BTC 86k call, 9 Oct 260.2$828.00$16.6K–
28 Sep 11:47Sold short BTC 80k put, 30 Oct 260.85$1,925.00$70.6K–
28 Sep 11:47Bought long BTC 82k put, 9 Oct 261$1,486.00$83K-$119.4
28 Sep 11:41Bought long BTC 90k call, 9 Oct 263 fills0.26$265.04$21.6K+$31.4
28 Sep 11:40Sold short BTC 86k call, 9 Oct 260.5$850.00$41.5K–
28 Sep 11:39Bought long BTC 90k call, 9 Oct 262 fills0.24$250.00$19.9K+$32.5
27 Sep 08:47Sold short BTC 90k call, 9 Oct 260.5$441.00$42.4K–
25 Sep 08:30Sold short BTC 78k put, 30 Oct 260.42$1,069.00$35.5K–
25 Sep 08:29Bought long BTC 76k put, 30 Oct 260.42$886.00$35.5K+$291.1
25 Sep 08:28Sold short BTC 86k call, 26 Sep 263 fills0.5$95.32$42.2K–
25 Sep 08:27Sold short BTC 83k put, 26 Sep 263 fills0.5$105.48$42.2K–
23 Sep 15:41Sold short BTC 86k call, 25 Sep 261$245.00$84.3K–
23 Sep 15:39Sold short BTC 80k put, 25 Dec 260.95$4,023.00$80.1K–
23 Sep 15:38Bought long BTC 84k put, 30 Oct 261$3,504.00$84.3K-$1K
21 Sep 20:36Sold short BTC 84k put, 30 Oct 261$2,510.00$87K–
21 Sep 20:32Bought long BTC 88k call, 9 Oct 260.95$2,604.00$82.8K-$998.1
21 Sep 09:48Sold short BTC 78k put, 30 Oct 262 fills1.18$1,205.00$100.2K–
21 Sep 09:46Bought long BTC 75k put, 30 Oct 261.18$888.00$100.3K+$1.9K
21 Sep 09:46Sold short BTC 88k call, 9 Oct 260.5$1,582.00$42.5K–
21 Sep 09:46Sold short BTC 82k put, 9 Oct 260.5$1,355.00$42.5K–
21 Sep 09:45Bought long BTC 86k call, 25 Sep 263 fills1$1,264.88$85K-$1.1K
21 Sep 09:44Sold short BTC 88k call, 9 Oct 260.45$1,576.00$38.3K–
21 Sep 09:44Sold short BTC 82k put, 9 Oct 260.5$1,464.00$42.5K–
21 Sep 09:42Bought long BTC 84k call, 22 Sep 261$1,366.00$85K-$1.3K
21 Sep 07:56Sold short BTC 84k call, 22 Sep 261$121.00$81.7K–
21 Sep 07:56Sold short BTC 80k put, 22 Sep 261$122.00$81.7K–
19 Sep 06:54Sold short BTC 86k call, 25 Sep 261$227.00$81K–
18 Sep 17:23Sold short BTC 76k put, 30 Oct 260.42$1,631.00$33.9K–
18 Sep 17:22Bought long BTC 74k put, 30 Oct 260.42$1,221.00$33.9K+$635.3
How PnL and positions are computed

PnL is our own accounting: average-cost realized plus open positions at the live mark, net of fees, with expired options settled at intrinsic. Derive’s own per-fill realized figure would say -$41; it books phantom amounts on RFQ opening legs and never settles expiries, so we do not use it.

Derive shows this account under its owner address 0x0cca7b60276162506f7c0be8cd6d4b71259107a7; trades are reported under the smart-wallet address above. Either works in the URL.

The 7-day follow estimate uses marked taker fills, before fees and slippage, divided by traded notional. Missing marks are excluded; expired options use an estimated settlement from the latest stored underlying price. It is not a return on account capital.

Positions are reconstructed from public fills since 2026-06-09, so anything opened before that shows only the part traded since. The realized column on fills is Derive's per-fill figure, shown for reference only.

Back to the leaderboard.

Page calculated 31 Oct, 10:59 UTC. Quotes and synced statistics may be older. Reload to check for updates; a cached page may appear while a newer snapshot is prepared.